Skip to main content
Loading
Logan Strother

Logan Strother

Assistant Professor // Political Science
Faculty

Curriculum vitae


Office and Contact

Room: BRNG 2246

Email: lstrothe@purdue.edu

Phone: (765) 496-6775


Ph.D. Syracuse University, 2017
M.A. Southern Illinois University, 2012
B.A. Missouri University of Science & Technology, 2010

 

https://loganstrother.wordpress.com/

 

Specializations

American Politics
Public Policy

 

Research Summary

Professor Strother's research focuses on American politics, especially judicial politics and public policy. He is particularly interested in how political institutions, the mass public, and political context interact to produce changes in public policy. His work has covered a range of topics including eminent domain, flood mitigation policy, free speech, and policing.

 

Awards 

2020 APSA Law & Courts Section Best Conference Paper Award

2019 Neal Tate Award, Southern Political Science Association Best Paper on Judicial Politics

 

Selected Publications

Glennon, Colin, and Logan Strother. 2019. “The Maintenance of Institutional Legitimacy in Supreme Court Justices’ Public Rhetoric.” Journal of Law and Courts 7 (2): 241-261. doi: 10.1086/703065

Menifield, Charles, Geiguen Shin, and Logan Strother. 2019. "Do White Law Enforcement Officers Target Minority Suspects?" Public Administration Review 79 (1): 56-68. doi: 10.1111/puar.12956

Strother, Logan. 2019. “Case Salience and the Influence of External Constraints on the Supreme Court.” Journal of Law and Courts 7 (1): 129-147. doi: 10.1086/701274

Strother, Logan. 2018. "The National Flood Insurance Program: A Case Study in Policy Failure, Reform, and Retrenchment." Policy Studies Journal 46 (2): 452-480. doi: 10.1111/psj.12189

Strother, Logan. 2017. "How Expected Political and Legal Impact Drive Media Coverage of Supreme Court Cases." Political Communication 34 (4): 571-589. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2017.1306817

Strother, Logan. 2016. "Beyond Kelo: An Experimental Study of Public Opposition to Eminent Domain." Journal of Law and Courts 4 (2): 339-375. doi: 10.1086/687322