|
General
Introduction to Psychoanalysis
PSYCHOANALYTICAL
CRITICISM aims to show that a literary
or cultural work is always structured by complex and often contradictory
human desires. Whereas New Historicism and Marx-inspired Cultural Materialism
analyze public power structures from, respectively, the top and bottom
in terms of the culture as a whole, psychoanalysis analyzes microstructures
of power within the individual and within small-scale domestic environments.
That is, it analyzes the interiority of the self and of the self's kinship
systems. By analyzing the formation of the individual, however, psychoanalysis
also helps us to understand the formation of ideology at largeand
can therefore be extended to the analysis of various cultural and societal
phenomena. Indeed, for this reason, psychoanalysis has been especially
influential over the last two decades in culture studies and film analysis.
Psychoanalysis is complicated by the fact that
it has undergone numerous transformations at the hands of highly influential
individual psychoanalysts. It is therefore necessary, as with many of
the theories currently influencing scholarship and teaching, to differentiate
between individual thinkers. For the purposes of studying literature and
culture, the most influential theorists today are Sigmund Freud (1856-1939),
Jacques Lacan (1901-1981), and Julia Kristeva (1941-?). The links on the
left will lead you to modules explaining in more detail specific concepts
by these individual thinkers; however, you might like to begin with a
quick overview:
THE
PLAYERS
Most people are familiar
with at least some of FREUD's
ideas given the important influence he has had on the literature and culture
of the twentieth century. Indeed, many of Freud's key terms have now entered
common parlance, terms such as repression,
libido, superego,
fetishism,
and so on; for this very reason, however, it is important to take the
popular definitions of such terms with a grain of salt, which is to say
that the terms were often much more complex in Freud's thinking than pop
culture tends to acknowledge.
LACAN
has proven to be an important influence on contemporary scholarship as
well, particularly for feminists, film theorists, and cultural critics.
Although Lacan used some of the general premises of Freudian psychoanalysis,
he re-thought elements of Freudian theory and also came up with his own
terms and ideas to explain various psychiatric phenomena. Whereas Freud
tended to hew closely to issues of sexuality in a biological sense, Lacan
argued that "the unconscious is structured like a language."
For this reason, he eschewed terms that suggested a "natural"
or "essential" reason for psychic processes (EEG, instincts,
appetites) and opted instead for terms that underlined how psychic processes
are always artificially constructed, like language or ideology. Following
this general premise, Lacan broke from the Freudian school and established
his own complex set of structures to explain the functioning of ideology
and thought in general.
KRISTEVA
began her own studies under Roland
Barthes and was heavily influenced by the structuralists associated
with the Tel Quel group (including Michel Foucault, Philippe Sollers,
and Roland
Barthes himself). Her interest in psychoanalysis was also inspired
by Jacques Lacan's structuralist re-interpretation of Freud, although
Kristeva has also carefully distinguished her own ideas from those of
Lacan. Kristeva was particularly critical of what she saw as an inherent
misogyny in Lacan's and Freud's theories; her own system of thinking therefore
attempts to rethink sexual development in such a way as to value the importance
of the feminine. For this reason, she has been especially influential
on theories of gender and sex. Each individual book by Kristeva has tended
to concentrate on and rethink a specific concept and has thus often influenced
critical understandings of the terms under discussion. The concepts that
she has been most influential in rethinking include horror and the abject;
mourning and melancholia; and the understanding of faith.
|