repositorywhite.gif (8460 bytes)

 

Burke to Basics: Dialogue and Cultural Studies in the First-Year Writing Program

Dennis Ciesielski, University of Wisconsin--Platteville

Abstract of a Paper Presented at the 1999 Triennial Conference of the Kenneth Burke Society

 

The college core curriculum is the one place where most college students will learn the basic foundations of the rhetorical process. Here is the territory where they will discover or not discover the profound importance of responsible dialogue through interpretation, persuasion, and argument beyond the generic competitive I win/you lose metaphors that our culture has come to place upon them. Because of rhetoric's overarching importance across the curriculum, it is imperative that we introduce first-year college/university students to dialogic theory an d practice as a means to their personal involvement in a participatory learning experience.

One of the best places to promote a cross-curricular dialogic rhetoric is in the first-year college writing course. Perhaps the most important part of any young person's college education, core curricula set up a value system much more relevant than many of our colleagues might believe. First-year students (or 13 th graders) are still at a very moldable stage. And, because we have the authorial title of professor attached to our presence, these children attach a great deal of faith in what we show and tell them. Thus, the way a writing class is presented, how it is taught, the reading list, the instructor's attitude, all influence a student's foundational attitude toward language, critical thinking, and rhetorical processes both inside and outside the classroom.

To promote and validate this sort of dialogic interaction, we can turn to the more productive and complex rhetorics alive in modem theory but often neglected in classroom practice, rhetorics like, Kenneth Burke's dramatism and his rhetoric of identity, Paulo Freire's conscientizacao and Edward 0 Wilson's consilience, (both of which depend upon dialogic convergence of various specialized knowledge systems) and James Berlin's social epistemic rhetoric which compels writers (and speakers) to discover meaning and knowledge as well as the means to rhetorically [re]offer this new knowledge back into the world from which it emerged. The basic components of these rhetorics all have one thing in common: the insistence that we all have the right (and duty) to maintain a voice in our own cultural/political environment, and that this right must be earned through an active involvement in our shared cultural discourse.

Maintaining and informing Burke's dramatistic rhetoric of identity, Friere and Berlin insist that dialogue is essential to education and freedom. By emphasizing cultural experience as text, students can become visible participants in the cultural and political forces that might otherwise control them. The sort of critical thinking required of this sort of education can best occur in the English writing/reading classroom where culture and personal experience can come to terms through honest, critical dialogue and the enabling rhetorical and stylistic strategies that will help students to add their voice to Kenneth Burke's "never ending conversation."

 

Return to the 1999 KB Conference Program


 

burketitlesmallwhite.gif (1952 bytes)
Last Updated: 19 March 1999--David Blakesley