ACCUTE (Association of Canadian College and
University Teachers of English)
occurs from May 28 to May 31, 2005 in London, Canada
Although participants must pay ACCUTE conference
dues, they are not required to become ACCUTE members as long as they
are NAVSA members
CFP:
Nervous Reactions: Romantic Heterologies and Victorian Hegemonies (11/15/03;
NAVSA/ACCUTE,
5/28/04-5/31/04)
These two
proposed panels explore the ‘Victorianization’ of Romantic
writers, texts, and ideas, and the construction of ‘Romanticism,’
by Victorian and Romantic writers alike. Nineteenth-century (re)appropriations
of Romantic identities frequently inscribed a dominant ideology of later
Victorian insight over an earlier Romantic blindness. As Matthew Arnold
writes, there was something about the “first quarter of this century”
that was “premature” because it “didn’t know
enough” about itself. What did the Victorians know, or pretend
to know, that the Romantics didn’t, and that they used as a way
of buttressing their own literary, social, political, economic, sexual,
and cultural hegemonies? Victorian attempts to regulate Romantic issues
of class, gender, sexuality, aesthetics, politics, nationality, and/or
the body are often simultaneously unsettled by these issues in ways
that exacerbate nineteenth-century anxieties about (Romantic) heterodoxy.
In Victorian attempts to appropriate Romanticism’s cultural legacy,
how does Romanticism displace a later Victorian legacy in which Romanticism’s
children become its admonitory parents? How is Victorianism a “nervous
reaction” to Romanticism?
1.
Victorian Romanticism
This panel
seeks papers that explore the legacy of Romanticism, Romantic writers,
and Romantic cultural currents in Victorian England. To what extent
did Victorian England rely on earlier Romantic ideas when fashioning
its own aesthetics, culture, politics, psychology, science, the public
sphere, sexuality, etc.? Possible topics include, but are not limited
to: Victorian responses to Romantic representations of nationality and
nationhood; auto/biography and the refashioning of Romantic subjectivity;
Romantic sexuality/the body/Victorian discipline; Romanticism and the
gendering of the separate spheres; re-imagining Romantic economics and
consumerism for the Victorian marketplace; the canonization and/or mourning
of Romantic authors/Romanticism through “recollections,”
“reminiscences,” and “literary remains”; editorial
and/or critical reconstructions of Romanticism and Romantic writers;
Victorian psychology’s debt to Romanticism’s science of
the mind; Victorian science’s debt to Romantic science.
2.
Victorian Misprisionings/Romantic Resistances
This panel
seeks papers that address how Victorian refashionings of Romanticism
are challenged by it. To what extent do earlier Romantic ideas unsettle
later Victorian ideologies that seek to contain them? How is Victorianism
a “nervous reaction” to Romanticism? Possible topics here
include, but again are not limited to: the breakdown and/or tenuousness
of traditional chronologies between the Romantic and the Victorian;
later nineteenth-century and twentieth-century debates about “the
Romantic” and “the Victorian”; Romantic writers as
“already Victorian” or “self-Victorianizing”
(Wordsworth, De Quincey, Hemans, Coleridge and his heirs, the Darwins,
Shelley and his heirs, etc.); the emergence of Victorian imperialisms
(political, encyclopedic, economic, cultural, intellectual empires)
already in Romanticism; Victorianism’s incomplete conservation
of Romantic radicalism; the construction (as opposed to reconstruction)
of “Romanticism” in the Victorian period (Romanticism as
a Victorian concept that lasts into the twentieth century).
For either
panel, please send by 15 November 2004 (WordPerfect or Word) 300-500
word proposals (plus bibliography) or papers of no more than 10 double-spaced
pages (with Works Cited), a 100-word abstract of the paper, and a 50-word
bio-bibliographical sketch of yourself to:
Joel Faflak
Department of English
University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario N6A 3K7
CANADA
jfaflak@uwo.ca